Monday, August 6, 2012

ON SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY AND ATHEISM

In this, i present thoughts of various scientists and philosophers on atheism, science and secularism that led me to atheism. although i do not mention them in many cases, i sure hope you enjoy my compilation that was my journey to who i am...


In great hope to understand who we are, where we come from, what the reality is and what our role is here, we turn to religions; science and some of us do not ask these questions at all for many different reasons.  Most people are too busy dealing with the responsibilities and distractions of daily life. Some may think that someone else will ask this, or that it is not important why the universe exists, because without any evidence, we can only ever guess the answer. But questioning the existence of the universe is essential, because until we understand our relationship with the universe, then how can we ever really know who we really are or what we are supposed to be doing, other than to blindly follow our instincts and attempt to satisfy our desires. Others might feel strange asking these questions being afraid that someone will ridicule them, which actually happens most of the time. This brings me to two possible conclusions to about these people, either to them the presence of god is so obvious or they are just naïve. But I wonder how any thinking being would fail to ask themselves even the basic questions in life, “why do we live or where did we come from?” do they just don’t want to trouble themselves of the mysteries of the universe, are they contented of what they are, are they just not curious or they are afraid of the truth? Probably they do not have the time or the inclination to contemplate the existence of the universe. When I consider the short duration of my life, swallowed up in the eternity of spaces of which am ignorant, and of which know me not, I rest frightened and astonished for there is no reason why I should be here rather than there. I sometimes wonder whether we already have all the tools for understanding this. What if the entire universe is a product of our imagination? What is real if nothing has real existence? Unfortunately, this debate about the existence of the universe is still being clouded by popular religious myths that were devised at a time when we knew very little about the universe. While some people close their minds in blind acceptance of these myths, others close their minds in blind reaction against them. We then have been trained what to think but not how to think. I feel that true understanding comes when you step over your ego; throw your old mental constructs away when they are of no longer of any use and make new based on broader information.  It is very easy to say that am religious or I am Christian but harder to make a greater leap that goes far beyond these childish roles we like to play, a leap where you appreciate both science and spirituality because the later might only mean 40% of the unknown universe. I know that science can only determine what is, but not what shall be, and beyond its realm, value judgments remain indispensable but on the other hand, religion is concerned only with evaluating human thought and actions; it is not qualified to speak of real facts and the relationships between them. Throughout human history man has plotted an intensive search for answers to his existence and purpose. This search has led him to recognize that there is a Superior Creator seemingly involved in the affairs of all men and in order for man to uncover the mystery to his existence, he must discover a way to get in touch with this Creator. This search has caused man to establish for himself a system of religion. Religion is defined as the search for the ultimate. In a wholesome search for God, many religions have been formed according to each man’s decided course of approach. These various forms have lead many toward certain idealistic perceptions of God such as Deism, Polytheism, Pantheism and such like. The evolution of religion has transformed itself many times over into various forms of approach toward a supernatural God. Theology is the study of God Himself, through His own words. These words of God are found in the many writings enclosed within the book known as the Bible. Theology takes these various writings and begins a systematic examination of their meaning, context and intent with the goal of discovering God and the very purpose of life. It not only rivals the intellectual scholars; it also exposes the inconsistencies of religious ambiguity.
The goals of Philosophy and Theology are the same. Each discipline sets out to answer the confounding inquiries of life. Whether it concerns the origin of man or the orderly structure of the universe each field of thought attempts to bridge mans unawareness to knowledge of himself and the purpose of his existence within the earth.  Although the aspirations are the same, each field of thought takes a different approach to reach an answer. Philosophy’s approach is through the intellect of man, while Theology’s approach is through the Spirit of man and the results of each discipline lies within the borders of their approach. Man’s ceaseless infatuation for obtaining a supernatural encounter with the invisible God has led him to arrange numerous religious obscurities ranging from religious superstitions to philosophical assumptions. The problem of finding God now lies both in man’s desire to find him and the method of his search. Man is seeking for the ultimate Creator through his own mind’s eye, logic and philosophical thought. The unstable expressions involved in the various obscurities in religion have caused man to seek an alternate viewpoint. This alternate viewpoint has spawned and propelled a diverse speculative opinion in the school of thought known as Philosophy and logic thinking
Philosophy is an attempt by scholarly individuals to answer the questions of man’s existence and purpose through an intellectual process. Philosophy’s main objective is to cause man to impartially examine his preconceptions, convictions, prejudices, and beliefs while progressively aiming toward the goal of what is known as knowledge. Philosophy has become a secular alternative to religion; it speculates that knowledge, however little the human brain can have and perceive of our universe, is better than mare belief. With so many variables to the religious experience, the philosophical approach has made great progress. This school of thought has not only caused man to question the existence of God, but it has led him to question his very own existence. The pursuit of a theistic encounter has been stalled by an aggressive intellectual quest.  The only way to keep man aware of God’s existence and mans purpose is through a discipline known as Theology. The intellectual approach consists of many variations that have evolved from within the school of Philosophy. Philosophy has given birth to other many branches of studies which include physics, psychology, anthropology, sociology, metaphysics, logic, ethics and much more. Each branch is formed to address the intellectual aptitude of man through reasoning and rationalization while negating the propensity of his spiritual person. The entire realm of philosophical thought views man’s existence as a total mishap, possessing no internal life force (spirit, or soul); however, he is conscious of his personal life experiences. David Hume, a Scottish Philosopher, disputes the notion of a self or rather any persons having a soul. He believes that possession of a soul is most likely fiction. “You”, he explains, “are merely a bundle of perceptions. You have consciousness of a continuing succession of experiences, but not of a continuing experience”.
.... to be continued

Friday, August 3, 2012

Promoting science, technology and innovation is no-longer a luxury but a necessity



Do you wonder what the world will look like in the next 30 years to come? Technology is rapidly changing our world. As I was watching the Google 2012 science fair, I realized that, Africans have put little effort in learning science to catch up with the western world. Only Swaziland made it to the finals with a carefully modeled project by two young boys, that would help poor farmers grow food. How do we talk about that science is part of our culture now? Science, technology and medicine are the things that are shaping our lives and the way we live?
Futurist and physicist Micho Kaku predicts many applications for biotechnology and nano technology. From nanotechnology, space science, artificial intelligence and human cloning, this leaves most African countries in a desperate state to catch up with the big giants in the fields. This reminds us to evaluate our science teachings in class that inorder not to drive the young science pursuers out of class. Science and technology teaching in class is changing rapidly in a desperate attempt to have more students take up science careers because that is the core of a country’s economy. Science in class should be more engaging for the students than being receivers and at any level, students should be introduced to research methods and how to do work on their own, outside that, I think the rest is dogma.

The ICT sector has proved itself to be capable to push us to greater heights through numerous software developments and the use of internet based programs. But little has been done to teach our students the under-laying principles of this technology, which means, we shall still rely on imported technology.  The biggest question of all is, how do we keep learners in science classrooms?
I bet you have come across phrases like, “sciences are hard,” “why do you study such maths like calculus that we won’t apply anywhere in life?” or that science is boring and many more myths and negative comments about maths and other science subjects. Truth be told, these disciplines need a little more hard work put in at school but they can, as other arts subjects, be studied and understood as well as passed. And it becomes worse when scientific concepts themselves are taught out of context to the students. Most of all, these students have no idea why studying science, technology and medicine is important and how to succeed from it. It is not a matter of saying, “work hard or read harder”. Sometimes you do not need to go to class to become a great scientist. Albert Einstein said, “Most people think that genius is the primary determinant of intellectual achievement. Yet the all-time greatest thinkers had in common, not inexplicable genius, but a questioning mind. Their intellectual skills and inquisitive drive embodied the essence of critical thinking. Through skilled deep and persistent questioning they redesigned our view of the physical world and the universe.” Here I introduce some of the “commandments’ for being a successful scientist;
1.      Should have curiosity
2.      Learn how to ask questions
3.      Your imagination and ideas is a great asset
4.      You need to work as a team and collaborations
5.      You need to know some history of and about science and how to do research
6.      Find a hobby in a science activity
7.      Passion and hard work
8.      Never give up but just change how you think about a problem
Most of the students fail at number 7. In science, we do not have failure, we just have wrong methods. So all you have to do is to change the method until you get the right answer. Like Albert Einstein said, you cannot solve a problem with the same mind that created it. I have come to believe that, a scientifically illiterate person might have difficulty finding a place in the future of this planet. We should put a lot of effort in classroom science, find an effective way of changing how children think.
James kamugisha ndahiro